What Does cs executive company law case studies pdf Mean?
What Does cs executive company law case studies pdf Mean?
Blog Article
seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based to the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Though the punishment may be severe, its purpose is not solely to hunt vengeance but to discourage prospective offenders and copyright the principles of justice and social order.
116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as established forth would not implement, given that the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, instead he continues to be acquitted on the criminal charges based on evidence and it is perfectly-settled law that once the civil servant is acquitted in the criminal case, then on this very charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment because of the department and held him disqualified for that post because acquittal for all future purposes. The aforesaid proposition has been established at naught because of the Supreme Court of Pakistan while in the case on the District Police Officer Mainwali and a couple of others v.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are not binding, but could possibly be used as persuasive authority, which is to give substance on the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.
R.O, Office, Gujranwala and also the police officials did not inform him that the identification parade from the accused hasn't been conducted still. In the moment case, now the accused attempted to choose advantage of the program aired by SAMAA News, wherein the picture on the petitioner was broadly circulated. The police should not have uncovered the identity of your accused through electronic media. The regulation lends assurance into the accused that the identity should not be subjected to the witnesses, particularly with the witness to detect the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer place a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and manufactured shots. Besides, the images shown around the media reveal that a mask was not placed over the accused to cover his identity until he was place up for an identification parade. Making images of the accused publically, both by showing the same on the witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or program, would create doubt during the proceedings of your identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to guarantee that there is not any chance for that witness to see the accused before going on the identification parade. The accused should not be shown on the witness in person or through any other method, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or perhaps the press or electronic media. Provided the reasons elaborated above, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C.
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may perhaps interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mildew the relief to make it proper towards the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence get more info or the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified because of the decision on the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment of your grid project and submitted that ample mitigation measures were in place to render any opportunity adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted being developed.
In fact, this provision nullifies the difference between manslaughter and murder. Section 318 from the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 defines Qatl-i-khata (manslaughter) as “Whoever, without intention to cause the death of or cause harm to the person causes death of this sort of person, possibly by mistake of act or by mistake of fact is said to commit qatl-i-khata.”
13. The Supreme Court has held that once the act of misconduct is set up as well as employee is found guilty after owing process of law, it's the prerogative from the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, out of the assorted penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed just isn't proportionate with the seriousness of your act of misconduct is just not ample nevertheless the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion inside a structured and lawful fashion. Read more
When the petitioner is simply present on the place of incidence without causing any injury into the deceased or PWs then in these circumstances, whether He's vicariously liable shall be decided because of the acquired trial Court after recording of your evidence.
This article delves into the intricacies on the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case regulation, to offer an extensive understanding of its implications and sensible applications.
104 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is well established now that the provision for proforma promotion will not be alien or unfamiliar to the civil servant service structure however it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it is actually lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may possibly if happy that a civil servant who was entitled for being promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his personal, wrongfully prevented from rendering service to the Federation/ province during the higher post, direct that these types of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of fork out and allowances of this kind of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Within the United States, people are not necessary to hire an attorney to represent them in either civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their individual can remember 1 rule of thumb when it relates to referring to case legislation or precedent in court documents: be as specific as feasible, leading the court, not only on the case, but to the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.